Iowa Democratic Caucus:
Clinton: .68 (67%)
Sanders: .34 (33%)
Iowa Republican Caucus:
Trump: .66 (62%)
Cruz: .32 (30%)
Rubio: .5 (5%)
Paul: .2 (2%)
Carson: .2 (2%)
The current nomination odds are:
Republican Nomination:
Trump: .47 (42%)
Rubio: .31 (27%)
Cruz: .13 (12%)
Bush: .8 (7%)
Kasich: .5 (4%)
Paul: .4 (4%)
Christie: 2 (2%)
Ryan: .1 (1%)
Carson: .1 (1%)
Romney: .1 (1%)
Democratic Nomination:
Clinton: .72 (69%)
Sanders: .28 (26%)
Biden: .5 (5%)
O'Malley: .1 (1%)
Each individual "market" on PredictIt is a yes/no event; for example, will Julian Castro be the Democratic nominee for Vice President in 2016, or will the Republican presidential nominee win at least 370 electoral votes in the 2016 general election. These markets work exactly like a stock market does; users place an offer to buy (or sell) a yes or no a certain number of shares for a given price, and if there is a match for their offer, they end up with a "no" or "yes" share for that event. For example, you can currently buy a yes share of Donald Trump sweeping the first four states (IA, NH, NV, SC) for 49 cents. If he wins all four states, your share is cashed in for a dollar, and if he does not, your share is valueless.
Prediction markets like PredictIt provide an interesting view of the "wisdom of crowds." Nate Silver famously relied on a similar prediction site, InTrade, for his 2008 and 2012 election analysis, particularly in the primaries. You can follow the odds for Iowa and the nominations, as well as hundreds of other markets, most of which are political, at:
https://www.predictit.org/Browse/Featured
Just to show how difficult it is to predict the outcome of caucuses FiveThirtyEight's polling of the Iowa Caucus, specifically on the Republican side, are quite different from the above polling numbers.
ReplyDeleteIowa Democratic Caucus:
Clinton: 67%
Sanders: 33%
O'Malley: <1%
Iowa Republican Caucus:
Trump: 46%
Cruz: 39%
Rubio: 14%
Carson: 1%
FiveThirtyEight calculates their probabilities of victory by weighting the quality of each poll based on its track record and its methodological standards. They also account for sample size and how recently it was conducted; recent polls are weighted much more heavily than older ones. Polls are also adjusted for house effects, which is a tendency to consistently show different results for a candidate than the average of other polls.
For the Iowa Republican caucuses, 84 polls have been collected.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/iowa-republican/