Polarization of science: Dr. Fauci and conflicting opinions

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/28/technology/coronavirus-fauci-trump-conspiracy-target.html?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage

The polarization surrounding science would seem like an oxymoron: science, an objective field based on discipline and reason, is under the scrutiny of many. In the last few weeks, Dr. Fauci has come under fire from a sect of Republicans, with many claiming they do not trust the information that comes from Dr. Fauci. Many accuse Dr. Fauci of trying to undermine the president, using tactics of fear and division to create discord among Americans. 

While this has become a pattern in the last few years, one thing stands out to me that makes this case slightly different. We are talking about science. Dr. Fauci is affectionately called the "Michael Jordan" of infectious diseases and is on Trump's task force, and yet is the brunt of much criticism. Science should not be partisan, and yet in the middle of the worst outbreak in the 21st century, here we are. 

Here is an interesting quote from the article that addresses the partisan nature of this issue: "The torrent of falsehoods aimed at discrediting Dr. Fauci is another example of the hyperpartisan information flow that has driven a wedge into the way Americans think. For the past few years, far-right supporters of President Trump have regularly vilified those whom they see as opposing him."